From: Matthew Heaney <matthewjheaney@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Should MI be supported (was: Can MI be supported?)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 03:25:20 GMT
Date: 2003-09-17T03:25:20+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uznh45c46.fsf@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F67D0FA.9020506@attbi.com
"Robert I. Eachus" <rieachus@attbi.com> writes:
> I guess we just have to agree to disagree on this. I personally find
> the mixin idiom to be more natural than the view conversion
> approach. But Ada allows both, and in fact several other ways to code
> the same example, and we are talking about adding one more.
Well, there you go. I much prefer access discriminants (I've sort of
abandoned the generic mixin approach -- too clunky for my taste), but to
each his own, as they say!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-17 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-16 8:16 Should MI be supported (was: Can MI be supported?) Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-09-16 11:02 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-09-17 3:12 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-09-17 3:25 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
2003-09-17 10:36 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-09-23 8:44 ` Robert I. Eachus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-18 8:25 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-09-16 11:57 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-09-17 3:36 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-09-17 18:16 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-09-15 17:15 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-09-15 23:26 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-09-16 16:23 ` Mário Amado Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox