From: Matthew Heaney <matthewjheaney@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Should MI be supported
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:31:32 GMT
Date: 2003-09-24T01:31:32+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uy8wfvum0.fsf@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F702462.3000608@crs4.it
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@crs4.it> writes:
> I think you may be right about this. I have never had much exposure to
> the multiple views and mix-ins ideoms besides discussions here on
> comp.lang.ada. Maybe it is a topic that needs a bit more coverage in
> one of the Ada journals (or elsewhere, where you can reach Ada
> programmes) and maybe also in the chapters on tagged types in various
> Ada textbooks (although I may have skipped too lightly over those).
If you have specific questions you should send them to "dearada" at
domain "adapower.com".
I think I know what the next column will be about, but the MI stuff
would make a good column, too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-24 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 17:15 Should MI be supported (was: Can MI be supported?) Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-09-15 23:26 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-09-23 10:45 ` Should MI be supported Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-09-24 1:31 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
2003-09-16 16:23 ` Should MI be supported (was: Can MI be supported?) Mário Amado Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox