From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org>
Subject: Re: How do you bitwise operations in Ada '83 and '95
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:59:43 -0400
Date: 2006-07-23T11:59:43-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uwta448i8.fsf@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2bqrihj0j.fsf@grendel.local
Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
> Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org> writes, responding to me:
>
>>> I have a feeling that shift&mask ends up more understandable
>>
>> Never.
>>
>>> and reviewable.
>>
>> In Ada 95, maybe. In Ada 2005, not.
>
> Really, understandable and reviewable are very similar, so I don't see
> how something could be (possibly) more reviewable while never more
> understandable.
Hmm. To me, "understandable" means "expressed in terms I am familiar
with, using idioms I am familiar with, and unambiguous". Or something
like that.
While "reviewable" means "traceable to source documentation".
So if I am familiar with the Ada 95 idiom for endianness-independent
rep clauses, they are "understandable". But because they are complex,
they may be less reviewable. I've never done a _formal_ review (trace to
source docs) of any software, so I'm on shaky ground here.
> Seriously, the C
>
> field = (longword >> 15) & 0x3f;
>
> is pretty clear.
At the bit level, yes. But if the 7 bits are supposed to represent
some object, actual names would be far preferable.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-23 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8B57A49E-38E9-44DC-9B4A-A3F69E058A97@amado-alves.info>
2006-07-20 9:39 ` Fwd: How do you bitwise operations in Ada '83 and '95 Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-20 17:54 ` tmoran
2006-07-20 18:30 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-20 19:36 ` tmoran
2006-07-20 22:09 ` Simon Wright
2006-07-21 10:07 ` Stephen Leake
2006-07-21 19:09 ` Simon Wright
2006-07-21 19:45 ` tmoran
2006-07-23 15:59 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2006-07-24 6:08 ` Simon Wright
[not found] <CD6E3BB8-52D2-4EED-A790-0184FE56A99A@amado-alves.info>
2006-07-20 20:41 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-20 23:13 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-07-21 5:38 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-21 22:09 ` Randy Brukardt
[not found] <BFF12262-F906-4F9A-B867-D0373609F038@amado-alves.info>
2006-07-20 16:40 ` Marius Amado-Alves
[not found] <9315684D-C216-4EDA-8852-0A6BD4C275B0@amado-alves.info>
2006-07-19 22:30 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-20 7:40 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-20 9:29 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2006-07-20 12:31 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-20 13:08 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2006-07-20 13:29 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-20 13:49 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-21 5:23 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2006-07-21 8:00 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-20 9:03 ` Stephen Leake
2006-07-20 9:38 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-21 9:53 ` Stephen Leake
2006-07-20 11:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-20 13:18 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-21 9:58 ` Stephen Leake
2006-07-21 12:09 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-21 19:03 ` Simon Wright
2006-07-22 8:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-22 8:57 ` Simon Wright
2006-07-22 10:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-22 13:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
[not found] <1153244316.853254.291560@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
2006-07-18 18:45 ` Robert A Duff
2006-07-18 18:53 ` jimmaureenrogers
2006-07-18 19:22 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-07-18 21:32 ` jimmaureenrogers
2006-07-19 0:40 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-07-19 3:55 ` jimmaureenrogers
2006-07-19 4:37 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-07-19 13:05 ` jimmaureenrogers
2006-07-19 19:43 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-07-19 14:41 ` Robert A Duff
[not found] ` <1153313832.389434.144930@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
2006-07-19 13:55 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-19 14:20 ` Robert A Duff
2006-07-19 19:30 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-07-18 19:21 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-07-19 3:01 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox