From: Kevin Chadwick <kc-usenet@chadwicks.me.uk>
Subject: Re: systemd controversy
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:16:50 -0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <utbomi$p6c7$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uta698$bdg5$4@dont-email.me>
>The declarative systemd unit-file syntax should be easier to translate to other forms than perhaps going the other way.
I can't see how non portable unit files backed by c code are more helpful
than atleast more portable scripts with less c per command to interpret, to
be honest.
--
Regards, Kc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-13 14:07 SystemD controversy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
2024-03-13 14:34 ` magardner2010
2024-03-13 16:41 ` Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
2024-03-13 19:01 ` Keith Thompson
2024-03-13 21:55 ` systemd controversy Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-18 17:05 ` streaksu
2024-03-18 19:56 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-19 0:36 ` streaksu
2024-03-19 2:36 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-19 3:01 ` streaksu
2024-03-19 10:16 ` Kevin Chadwick [this message]
2024-03-19 22:29 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-20 0:58 ` Kevin Chadwick
2024-03-20 3:17 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-20 9:56 ` Kevin Chadwick
2024-03-20 23:01 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-21 0:06 ` Alexis
2024-03-21 1:50 ` Kevin Chadwick
2024-03-21 2:41 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-21 0:10 ` Alexis
2024-03-13 20:32 ` SystemD controversy Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox