From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Subject: Re: systemd controversy
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:36:14 -0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <utatmu$k004$2@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: utamm4$f0s1$1@dont-email.me
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:36:20 +0100, streaksu wrote:
> If you are, for example, a maintainer for devuan (a systemd less debian)
> I imagine you will appreciate those being there for documentation rather
> than not.
After they’ve recovered from an apoplectic fit at having to deal with the
kind of systemd-related stuff they specifically set up Devuan to get away
from.
;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-13 14:07 SystemD controversy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
2024-03-13 14:34 ` magardner2010
2024-03-13 16:41 ` Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
2024-03-13 19:01 ` Keith Thompson
2024-03-13 21:55 ` systemd controversy Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-18 17:05 ` streaksu
2024-03-18 19:56 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-19 0:36 ` streaksu
2024-03-19 2:36 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro [this message]
2024-03-19 3:01 ` streaksu
2024-03-19 10:16 ` Kevin Chadwick
2024-03-19 22:29 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-20 0:58 ` Kevin Chadwick
2024-03-20 3:17 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-20 9:56 ` Kevin Chadwick
2024-03-20 23:01 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-21 0:06 ` Alexis
2024-03-21 1:50 ` Kevin Chadwick
2024-03-21 2:41 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-03-21 0:10 ` Alexis
2024-03-13 20:32 ` SystemD controversy Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox