Re: Is JGNAT production ready?...

[Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>]

"Andrzej Lewandowski" <lewandoREMOVE@attglobal.net> writes:

> I am working on some Java application that is heavily using threads.
> Programming multithreaded applications in Java is, ehem... sorry...
> no fun. Therefore, I have undusted my Ada83 skills, upgraded to 95
> and I am thinking about using JGNAT for this part of application that
> uses threads, with the rest in plain Java.
> 
> This is commercial application, and I have no room for mistakes.

So the main mistake will be to use the puplic release meaning no support :)

> Mistakes would be expensive. Therefore, the question(s): what is the
> quality of JGNAT? Is here anybody who has experience with using
> JGNAT for medium-size real life projects? Linking JGNAT modules
> with Java modules? Quality of JGNAT threads?...
> 
> Other question: is GNU JGNAT as good/bad as the commercial version
> of JGNAT? Are they the same JGNATs?...

Well JGNAT is JGNAT. The main difference is the support not the tool.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|         http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"