who is in charge of Ada 0Y?

who is in charge of Ada 0Y?

[svaa]

I've seen a lot of posts and discussions about a future Ada, Ada 0Y.
What should be added, what should be removed, what should change. But,
is there any organization in charge of writing such new standard?

As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada
0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed.
Have I missed something? is there such organization?

Re: who is in charge of Ada 0Y?

[Martin Dowie]

"svaa" <svaa@ciberpiula.net> wrote in message
news:87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com...
> I've seen a lot of posts and discussions about a future Ada, Ada 0Y.
> What should be added, what should be removed, what should change. But,
> is there any organization in charge of writing such new standard?
>
> As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada
> 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed.
> Have I missed something? is there such organization?

Yes, you have missing a _lot_, start from

Re: who is in charge of Ada 0Y?

[Matthew Heaney]

svaa@ciberpiula.net (svaa) writes:

> As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada
> 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed.
> Have I missed something? is there such organization?

I don't know whether Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, but the language is
actively being maintained under the stewardship of the ARG (Ada
Rapporteur Group).

In fact I just submitted a proposal for a standard container library for
Ada 0X to the ARG this very afternoon!

<http://home.earthlink.net/~matthewjheaney/charles/index.html>

Re: who is in charge of Ada 0Y?

[Martin Dowie]

"Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:...
> "svaa" <svaa@ciberpiula.net> wrote in message
> news:87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com...
> > I've seen a lot of posts and discussions about a future Ada, Ada 0Y.
> > What should be added, what should be removed, what should change. But,
> > is there any organization in charge of writing such new standard?
> >
> > As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada
> > 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed.
> > Have I missed something? is there such organization?
>
> Yes, you have missing a _lot_, start from

here:

http://www.ada-auth.org/

and follow a couple of the links, e.g.

http://www.ada-auth.org/ais.html
http://www.ada-auth.org/arg-minutes.html

(oops, fat-finger problem)