From: Matthew Heaney <matthewjheaney@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: who is in charge of Ada 0Y?
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:25:41 GMT
Date: 2003-09-26T00:25:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <usmmkieck.fsf@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com
svaa@ciberpiula.net (svaa) writes:
> As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada
> 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed.
> Have I missed something? is there such organization?
I don't know whether Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, but the language is
actively being maintained under the stewardship of the ARG (Ada
Rapporteur Group).
In fact I just submitted a proposal for a standard container library for
Ada 0X to the ARG this very afternoon!
<http://home.earthlink.net/~matthewjheaney/charles/index.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-26 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 21:19 who is in charge of Ada 0Y? svaa
2003-09-25 22:51 ` Martin Dowie
2003-09-26 0:25 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-25 22:53 Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox