From: Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: smalltalk vs. Ada
Date: 09 Jun 2001 09:36:40 +0200
Date: 2001-06-09T07:36:53+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ur8wuqf3r.fsf@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B214CF2.1CBE6C04@mediaone.net
Ed Falis <efalis@mediaone.net> writes:
> I have. It's a pleasure - much less "plumbing" to do OOP compared to Ada, if
> that's what you want to do. The MI facilities work really well (unlike C++),
> the syntax is clean like Ada, and DbC is very useful (though pragma Assert in
> Ada gets you most of the way there). It's much weaker in terms of portability
> of code between compilers than Ada is. And it's not quite there yet for
> concurrency, or IMO real-time and systems programming. Garbage collection also
> removes a lot of plumbing for general kinds of applications. If you can't
> tell, Ada and Eiffel are my favorite languages.
I second that. And for me too Ada and Eiffel are my favorite languages.
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-09 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-07 22:20 smalltalk vs. Ada Rod Weston
2001-06-07 22:27 ` Ed Falis
2001-06-08 0:32 ` Gary Scott
2001-06-07 22:46 ` Aron Felix Gurski
2001-06-08 1:26 ` Jon S Anthony
2001-06-08 14:16 ` Marin David Condic
2001-06-08 20:17 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-06-08 22:01 ` Wes Groleau
2001-06-08 23:03 ` Chris Campbell
2001-06-09 11:11 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-06-08 22:08 ` Ed Falis
2001-06-09 7:36 ` Pascal Obry [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox