comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: gprof with gnat
Date: 06 May 2002 10:14:41 -0400
Date: 2002-05-06T14:21:23+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ur8kp8isu.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: db6d897a.0205051240.193c7e6a@posting.google.com

chfr_rey@bluemail.ch (cfrey) writes:

> yes and no ... :-)
> think about this : when you receive a send a reply letter to someone,
> and you must send him a copy of the letter he previously wrote, you
> put it in annex, right ? 

Only because of the limitations of the paper medium. Cutting and
pasting paper would make the reply easier to read, but it is messy and
cumbersome. 

Or, if it's in a legal or formal context, keeping the original message
intact may be important, to lessen the chances of taking things out of
context. Newsgroups are very informal, and you can always get the
original anyway.

> so I think it's possible to do the same with messages in ng ...
> isn't it ? 

It is certainly possible; Marin David Condic (to pick one poster) does
it all the time.

However, I prefer mixed replies, like I'm doing here. It makes it much
clearer what you are responding to. When I read one of Marin's posts,
I first scroll to the bottom to see what he's responding to, then I
scroll back to the top (often a long way :) to read Marin's
contribution. Much better to present a linear flow.

> but, i agree it's maybe not the common way to write messages ...

Based on my personal survey of the newsgroups I read, the interspersed
reply style (as I am using here) is much more common. I think most
people feel it is more readable.

-- 
-- Stephe



  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-06 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-29 10:40 gprof with gnat Charles Fr. Rey
2002-04-30  6:37 ` Eric G. Miller
2002-04-30 10:10   ` Charles Fr. Rey
2002-04-30 10:12 ` Charles Fr. Rey
2002-04-30 13:58   ` Ted Dennison
2002-04-30 19:31     ` Gautier
2002-05-01 17:18       ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-01 12:30     ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 17:49       ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-01  4:06 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-05-01  6:11   ` Charles Fr. Rey
2002-05-01 12:33     ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 18:23       ` Bad reply practice (OT) Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-03  8:46         ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-02  6:49       ` gprof with gnat Charles Fr. Rey
2002-05-02 11:53         ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-02 14:18           ` [OT] ettiquite - was " Mark Johnson
2002-05-02 17:34             ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-03  8:41             ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-03 13:22               ` Hyman Rosen
2002-05-04  1:53                 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-07 15:08                 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-05-08  2:29                   ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-03  7:09           ` Charles Fr. Rey
2002-05-03 12:01             ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-04  2:07               ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-03 12:24             ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-05-05 20:40               ` cfrey
2002-05-06 14:14                 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2002-05-09 17:43                   ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-10 22:20                     ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-06 15:41                 ` Wes Groleau
2002-05-07 11:53                   ` Charles Fr. Rey
2002-05-07 17:12                     ` WAY OFF TOPIC Wes Groleau
2002-05-07 19:03                       ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-08  8:47                         ` Charles Fr. Rey
2002-05-01  8:40   ` gprof with gnat Pascal Obry
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox