From: Ray Blaak <blaak@infomatch.com>
Subject: Re: C++ STL Components and Ada
Date: 19 Jul 2001 13:48:38 -0700
Date: 2001-07-19T13:48:38-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <upuawr6ft.fsf@infomatch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B5450EF.7D82CCF5@worldnet.att.net
James Rogers <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> I find it ineresting that Java, in its current work to implement a
> generic programming capability has rejected the C++ template model.
> Instead it has adopted a model very similar to the Ada generic
> model, where instantiation is performed at comile time. The reasons
> given for this are stronger type safety and better compatibility with
> existing Java Virtual Machines. This model allows the Virtual Machines
> to be entirely ignorant of generics. All they see is normal byte
> code for fully instantiated classes.
Do you have some URLs for discussions of Java generics? I found a slide show
at java.sun.com, but could not get it due to password problems.
--
Cheers, The Rhythm is around me,
The Rhythm has control.
Ray Blaak The Rhythm is inside me,
blaak@infomatch.com The Rhythm has my soul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-19 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-16 0:37 C++ STL Components and Ada James Rogers
2001-07-17 4:26 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-07-17 14:48 ` James Rogers
2001-07-17 19:47 ` Jon Orris
2001-07-18 3:09 ` James Rogers
2001-07-18 15:48 ` Matthias Benkmann
2001-07-18 18:00 ` Jon Orris
2001-07-19 20:48 ` Ray Blaak [this message]
2001-07-20 0:40 ` Brian Rogoff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox