From: Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Can't be a varient record?
Date: 2000/01/27
Date: 2000-01-27T18:28:59+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uoga7l6cz.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 388CA023.2F4001DB@alphasoft-inc.com
Roga Danar <work@alphasoft-inc.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have inherited some code and came across this type and it's
> associated "doc".
>
> Is the reason that record cannot be may a varient record valid?
> <snip>
The "reason" given is :
> Note that since this record is stored in
> non-elaborated memory, it cannot be a variant record.
The concept "non-elaborated memory" is not an Ada concept. You'll have
to find out what that means, precisely, before you can know whether it
is still valid in your current application.
-- Stephe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-24 0:00 Can't be a varient record? Roga Danar
2000-01-27 0:00 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox