From: Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Import a type from C
Date: 07 Nov 2002 08:47:54 -0500
Date: 2002-11-07T13:58:54+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uof918p9x.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3dca4583$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
> May be specifying both
>
> pragma Convention( C, My_Data );
> and
> pragma Pack( My_Type );
>
> will be compatible with gcc -fpacked?
Well, it might, but the standard doesn't say. Actually, I would hope
the compiler would reject this, since it is asking for conflicting
things.
I guess my real point is that the standard does _not_ clearly state
what Convention (C, ...) really means (it is entirely implementation
dependent), so I can't rely on it.
Ada is supposed to be easy to _read_, not necessarily easy to _write_.
Convention (C) is just a shortcut for the proper rep clause.
Hmm. I guess if you have two Ada compilers, and two corresponding C
compilers, and you use the correct command line flags on the C
compilers, and the corresponding rep clauses are different, then
Convention C is a better alternative than gnatprep to choose the
representation. However, in my experience, I end up needing gnatprep
(for other reasons) in a situation like that anyway.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-07 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-06 19:48 Import a type from C Francisco Santoyo
2002-11-06 20:06 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-11-06 23:10 ` Stephen Leake
2003-01-08 20:46 ` Rupert Pigott
2003-01-10 3:48 ` Eric G. Miller
2003-01-14 4:47 ` David Thompson
2002-11-07 7:16 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-07 13:47 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2002-11-07 16:03 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-11-07 16:20 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-08 14:51 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-07 19:00 ` chris.danx
2002-11-08 4:02 ` Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox