From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages??
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:42:11 -0500
Date: 2002-08-14T14:42:11-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ullciq2ngtog2d@corp.supernews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dstanbro-E13D57.19534014082002@news-server.bigpond.net.au
Dale Stanbrough wrote in message ...
>Randy Brukardt wrote:
>
>> Yes, AI-262, "private with". Already approved by the ARG. The example
>> would be written in Ada 0Y as:
> ...
>
>Excellent! Time to drag out some old programs.
>
>Does anyone know if any compiler vendors have implemented this
>yet? (and more significantly for me, has Gnat implemented it?).
>I tried it out on the Mac port (which calls itself GNAT 5.00w)
>but it objected.
So far as I'm aware, no vendors have implemented this yet. The ARG just
approved it at the last meeting, so I'm not surprised about that. The
only "new" thing that I know has been implemented by any compiler (as
opposed to things that are present in many compilers already, like
Unchecked_Union) is type stubs. But I don't know if those
implementations will be made available to customers any time soon.
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-14 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 21:23 Visibility of private packages?? Peter Coventry
2002-07-31 9:13 ` John McCabe
2002-07-31 12:06 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-07-31 13:30 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-14 1:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-14 9:53 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-08-14 17:03 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-14 19:42 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2002-07-31 11:55 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-07-31 13:22 ` Mark Doherty
2002-07-31 17:43 ` Anh_Vo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox