comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Subject: Re: TIOBE Programming Community Index for November 2007
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:19:44 -0500
Date: 2007-11-06T05:19:44-05:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ulk9b1xrz.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 472eed9f$1@news.post.ch

Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

> Stephen Leake schrieb:
>
>> Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>> 
>>> You, I don't like the index, but it is there, widely used 
>> 
>> What data do you have to back up the assertion that it is "widely
>> used"?
>
> Google for "TIOBE Programming Community Index" ;-).

Ok, so several (many? lots?) of other web sites reference it.

To me, "used", in this context, means "employed as a criteria for
choosing a language".

How many people pick a language for a project based on this web site?

>> As a counter point, this is the first I've heard of it.
>
> You can't be long here at comp.lang.ada - I have an article on it every
> 3 to 6 month.

Well, I've been here longer than that. I guess my newsgroup memory
filter has been ignoring these posts.

>>> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>> 
>> It says:
>> 
>>     Observe that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming
>>     language or the language in which most lines of code have been
>>     written.
>> 
>> So why should we care?
>
> Because it also says:
>
>    The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are
>    still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what
>    programming language should be adopted when starting to build
>    a new software system.

Well, it may _say_ that, but I don't _believe_ it!

The number of websites that satisfy its search criteria does _not_
correlate with my ability to get a job programming in Ada.

> And have a look at the Ada bashing on the definition page:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe_index/tpci_definition.htm
>
>    This is what you also see in daily practice: Ada is hardly used for
>    new mission-critical systems any more.
>
> Emphasis on "new". This is the problem: Right or wrong - they tell the
> world which language to use in future. And this is why we should care.

I beg to differ; this is why we should educate managers about _real_
reasons to pick languages.

-- 
-- Stephe



  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-06 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-04 17:56 TIOBE Programming Community Index for November 2007 Martin Krischik
2007-11-04 19:08 ` j.khaldi
2007-11-04 21:27   ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-11-04 21:09 ` Markus E L
2007-11-05  9:19   ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-05 10:24     ` Markus E L
2007-11-06 20:20     ` Gautier
2007-11-05  1:10 ` anon
2007-11-05  7:27   ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-05  8:54     ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-11-05  9:35       ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-05 11:07         ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-11-05 19:46         ` Manuel Gomez
2007-11-05 10:11       ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-11-05 11:07         ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-11-05  9:34     ` Stephen Leake
2007-11-05 10:05       ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-06 10:21         ` Stephen Leake
2007-11-06 17:38           ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-05 13:19     ` anon
2007-11-05 13:54       ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-05 16:00         ` anon
2007-11-05 16:10           ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-05  9:29 ` Stephen Leake
2007-11-05 10:16   ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-06 10:19     ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2007-11-06 10:56       ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-11-06 17:25       ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-06 20:35 ` Simon Wright
2007-11-07 16:22   ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox