From: Stephen Leake <Stephen.A.Leake@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Ada compiler for 68hc11?
Date: 31 Mar 2003 12:24:14 -0500
Date: 2003-03-31T17:38:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uistztpoh.fsf@nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5CB092B5E73F8732.EE74AA87878A038F.C036C4E988171C8E@lp.airnews.net
"John R. Strohm" <strohm@airmail.net> writes:
> "Stephane Carrez" <stcarrez@nerim.fr> wrote in message
> news:3E84CB25.8070307@nerim.fr...
> > ... because the GNAT runtime is not ported yet to 68HC11. (I'm also pretty
> sure
> > it will not fit as is on an embedded system like the HC11). You can't
^^^^^
> According to Jean Ichbiah, Who By All Rights Ought To Know If ANYONE ON THE
> PLANET Ought To, an Ada runtime can be written in 4K. Strictly speaking,
> that was 4K Storage_Units. The Ada runtime for the TI 320C30/C40
> floating-point DSP did in fact fit in 4K words (at one instruction per word,
> I should add).
Well, sure. But the current public release of the GNAT runtime is not
designed to fit in 4k; it is designed to support a wide range of
systems with minimal change. Very different criteria!
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-31 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-28 8:20 Ada compiler for 68hc11? Rune Winther
2003-03-28 9:26 ` Alfred
2003-03-28 22:22 ` Stephane Carrez
2003-03-28 22:42 ` John R. Strohm
2003-03-31 17:24 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2003-03-31 7:38 ` Rune Winther
2003-04-05 7:09 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox