Re: Requeue

["Pat Rogers" <progers@classwide.com>]

"Anatoly Chernyshev" <rhezusfactor@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3CB36065.1BC7FF6B@yahoo.com...
> > Ya nye penemiyu.  I gave you a rather lengthy intro to the requeue semantics
as
> > well as a pointer to a good textbook dedicated to concurrency with Ada.
Others
> > did as well.  The Rationale would have been a good thing for me to have
> > included, and it is not the "FM", so are you complaining about someone
pointing
> > you to the Rationale, and, if so why?
>
> Poimite zhe nakonec. I appreciate your efforts (frankly, no kidding) and
comments of
> other people and I'm not complaining a bit.
> I simply issued a distracted remark (mainly in response to R. Dewar's post)
meaning
> that everyone could become Ada guru just pointing others to Rationale and if
people
> will always follow
> his advice, there will be no need for CLA. Especially for periodically arisen
> questions like "How to convert integer to string".
> But I never expected that great programmers are so offensive.

I'm sure he meant no offense;  I was remiss in not mentioning the Rationale to
you myself.  Definitely worth reading because (by definition) it explains why
the language contains what it does, which helps people use the language well.  I
very much appreciated "Studies In Ada Style" (for Ada 83) for the same reason.

Best regards,

Pat