Re: Elaboration in GNAT

[Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>]

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:

> Mark Johnson <Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com> wrote in message news:<3C052930.4FE65C5D@Raytheon.com>...
> > Robert of course may give you slightly different 
> > suggestions. One that I tend
> > to ignore is to not use "gnatwa", but to specify exactly 
> > which warnings you
> > want and don't want. I have found over the last several 
> > months that added
> > warnings from gnatwa are beneficial and I'm sticking with 
> > it.
> > 
> >   --Mark
> 
> 
> That's fine, but you have to be prepared for new warnings
> to pop up without warning, since we often add new warnings!

This is true. However, they usually indicate true defects in my code.
I agree with Mark; my code gets better with each release of GNAT!

Keep up the good work, Robert :).

-- 
-- Stephe