comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fraser Wilson <newsfraser@blancolioni.org>
Subject: Re: Commercial C To Ada 95 compiler
Date: 10 Jun 2002 10:11:11 +0200
Date: 2002-06-10T08:09:39+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <uelffpn8g.fsf@FWILSON.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D039352.779DFE8E@adaworks.com

Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com> writes:

>   This will still compile.    The point is that someone said this
>   kind of thing would be rejected as an error by an Ada compiler.
>   It is not rejected by every compiler, even though some compilers
>   might provide a warning.

True.  On the other hand, everybody iterates through arrays with a for
loop over the range, an option not available in C.  I think this is
idiom one of the key wins for Ada: no range checking required, no
performance penalty, and no chance of a run time exception.

I expect that detecting this as a special case in a C to Ada compiler
would not be excessively difficult, assuming the array bounds were
available somewhere (though recognising the extra length argument to
an array handling function would be tricky).

cheers,
Fraser.



  reply	other threads:[~2002-06-10  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-03  9:26 Commercial C To Ada 95 compiler Henrik Quintel
2002-06-03 18:52 ` Ingo Marks
2002-06-04  6:40   ` Henrik Quintel
2002-06-04 14:11     ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-06-04 14:26       ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-04 16:38         ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-06-03 20:26 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-04  6:43   ` Henrik Quintel
2002-06-04 14:18     ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-06-07  3:48 ` Richard Riehle
2002-06-07 12:46   ` SteveD
2002-06-07 13:20     ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-09 21:43       ` Stephen Leake
2002-06-10 13:17         ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-11 12:52           ` SteveD
2002-06-11 13:32             ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-12 14:07               ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-06-12 13:21                 ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-07 13:21   ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-06-07 19:48     ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-07 20:26       ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-08  3:19         ` SteveD
2002-06-08  3:59           ` Jim Rogers
2002-06-08  4:14             ` Darren New
2002-06-08  4:50               ` SteveD
2002-06-08 12:04                 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-10 18:44               ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-10 19:23                 ` Darren New
2002-06-10 20:55                   ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-10 21:03                     ` Darren New
2002-06-08  4:46             ` SteveD
2002-06-08 12:11               ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-08 18:46                 ` SteveD
2002-06-10 13:34                   ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-11 16:38                     ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-11 17:27                       ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-12 13:18                         ` Pascal Obry
2002-06-10 18:47               ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-10 21:23                 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-06-10 20:59                   ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-10 21:37                     ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-10 22:34                       ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-08 12:06             ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-08 15:53             ` Richard Riehle
2002-06-08 15:58               ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-10 13:37                 ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-10 23:32                   ` Darren New
2002-06-11 13:11                     ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-12 15:42                       ` Darren New
2002-06-21 17:23                         ` David Thompson
2002-06-08 17:45               ` tmoran
2002-06-08 18:32               ` Pascal Obry
2002-06-09 17:41                 ` Richard Riehle
2002-06-10  8:11                   ` Fraser Wilson [this message]
2002-06-08 20:06               ` Jim Rogers
2002-06-09 17:49                 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox