comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Q: Refactorizing code because Inheritance and Interfaces
Date: 20 Oct 2003 14:57:35 -0400
Date: 2003-10-20T18:01:29+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <uekx7n3ds.fsf@nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8lc761-u81.ln1@boavista.snafu.de

Michael Erdmann <Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de> writes:

> In order to line up the implemenation of the XML_Reader with the 
> Abstract_Reader interface i need to rewrite the complete XML_Reader.
> Is there any way to avoid such situations?

In general, no. Refactoring is hard work. That's why it's worth doing :).

> In java i would use   constructs as implements  Sax..,Abstract_Reader.

Ada 200Y will have interface inheritance similar to Java's. But you
still need to rewrite the implementation, so I don't see that as
saving much work.

You can get something similar to interface inheritance in Ada 95 using
generic mixins. It depends on the details of what you are doing
exactly what approach to take.

-- 
-- Stephe



  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-20 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-18  9:10 Q: Refactorizing code because Inheritance and Interfaces Michael Erdmann
2003-10-20 18:57 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2003-10-21 19:58   ` Michael Erdmann
2003-10-21  5:48 ` Simon Wright
2003-10-21  8:38   ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-10-21 19:50     ` Michael Erdmann
2003-10-25 12:11       ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-10-21 20:01   ` Michael Erdmann
2003-10-23 14:02     ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-21  9:00 Lionel.DRAGHI
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox