From: "Jeffrey R.Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org.not>
Subject: Re: Is gnoga dead?
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 13:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <udhmm5$3vhl4$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38ab0ff7-afe0-4dfc-a073-427b46283451n@googlegroups.com>
On 2023-09-09 11:02, reinert wrote:
> I asked google bard:
>
> "Is gnoga currently maintained?"
>
> And it answered:
>
> "No, Gnoga (Ada) is also no longer maintained. It was a fork of the original
Gnoga project that was created in 2012. The last commit to the GitHub repository
was in 2016.
>
> Gnoga (Ada) was an attempt to improve the performance and scalability of
Gnoga. It used a different statistical approach to NLG and was implemented in Ada.
>
> There are a number of other NLG engines available, such as GPT-3 and LaMDA,
which are more powerful and up-to-date than Gnoga (Ada)."
>
> Is this correct?
The presence of the word "also" in the first sentence should be enough to tell
you that this is nonsense.
If you are asking about an "NLG engine" named gnoga, then maybe this is correct.
If you are asking about the Ada web-application framework Gnoga that Blady
maintains, then it's not correct.
--
Jeff Carter
“Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics
is not fully human.”
The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-09 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-09 9:02 Is gnoga dead? reinert
2023-09-09 9:53 ` Blady
2023-09-09 11:47 ` reinert
2023-09-09 11:59 ` Jeffrey R.Carter [this message]
2023-09-09 16:46 ` reinert
2023-09-09 17:55 ` Stéphane Rivière
2023-09-10 6:51 ` reinert
2023-09-11 7:52 ` Stéphane Rivière
2023-09-12 6:00 ` reinert
2023-09-12 7:16 ` Stéphane Rivière
2023-09-15 8:23 ` reinert
2023-09-10 6:54 ` reinert
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox