From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Subject: Re: ASIS : questions about the ASIS status against the Ada reference
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:25:45 -0400
Date: 2009-06-06T02:25:45-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ud49hg9p2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8b07543e-6328-4b9a-8f43-56d3eec9f57c@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com
"Hibou57 (Yannick Duch�ne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> writes:
> Looking at the ASIS package specifications and even more at the ASIS
> issues at ada-auth, I began to feel that a lot of efforts are still
> running at making ASIS able to fully represent all possible Ada 2005
> constructions.
Right.
> From here, comes these fundamental questions :
>
> - Is the ability of ASIS to represent all Ada 2005 constructions
> formally provable ?
I doubt it. But why do you want to know?
> - Can ASIS be viewed as another expression of a part of the Ada 2005
> reference in a special formalism ?
Probably.
> While I know ASIS is mainly useful for code analysies, audits,
> statistics, etc, I though about another question which may give an
> answser to these two latter ones : formally speaking (although perhaps
> not practicable), is it theorically possible to imagine a compiler
> builded around ASIS ?
I don't see how; ASIS presumes a compiler that generates the
information ASIS uses. Why build another compiler on top of that?
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-06 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 17:01 ASIS : questions about the ASIS status against the Ada reference Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-06-05 17:23 ` Pascal Obry
2009-06-06 6:25 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2009-06-06 19:23 ` Tero Koskinen
2009-06-07 9:48 ` Stephen Leake
2009-06-08 22:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2009-06-06 9:24 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox