From: Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Generic child units
Date: 13 May 2003 14:38:10 -0400
Date: 2003-05-13T18:53:38+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ubry6heul.fsf@nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ec12f93$1@epflnews.epfl.ch
Rodrigo Garc�a <rodrigo.garcia.ARROBA.epfl.ch> writes:
> I need some enlightment in this area... Let us suppose that I have two
> generic packages declared in separate files and one is the parent of
> the other:
>
> generic
> type Elem is private;
> package Parent is
> type Vector is array (Integer range <>) of Elem;
> end Parent;
>
> generic
> package Parent.Child is
> subtype Vector2D is Vector (1 .. 2);
> end Parent.Child;
>
> How can I instantiate the child package
with Parent.Child;
procedure Foo is
package Par is new Parent (Elem => Integer);
package Chi is new Par.Child;
begin
...
end Foo;
Note that the second instantiation is "Par.Child", not "Parent.Child".
> within the declarative region of the parent package (as required by
> RM 10.1(18))?
There is no RM 10.1 (18), at least in the copy I have (came with
GNAT). And I don't understand the rest of the sentence, either. So I
don't know what you mean here.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-13 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-13 17:46 Generic child units
2003-05-13 18:38 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2003-05-13 19:18 ` David C. Hoos
2003-05-14 7:56 `
2003-05-15 16:30 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-16 1:08 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-16 19:24 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-16 23:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-05-17 0:57 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-17 1:11 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-05-17 1:04 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-16 23:44 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-05-17 0:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-05-17 1:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox