comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Subject: Re: Should a GUI be separated from the application?
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:09:23 -0400
Date: 2006-09-27T09:09:23-04:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <uac4l78xo.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1159290971.834857.212700@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com

"Lucretia" <lucretia9@lycos.co.uk> writes:

> When developing an application it is *mostly* combined with the GUI, a
> lot of toolkits do this. You would extend a UI tagged-type (or class,
> or whatever your language uses) and include the code inside the new
> tagged-type, an example would be a toolkit which provides event handler
> callbacks via primitive types (a la CLAW) thus forcing you to include
> your application code into the new derived type.
>
> Is this the best thing to do? 

The users have the option of making the "application code" in the GUI
framework just communicate with the real application, via rendezvous,
sockets or whatever.

> Should I give the users the option?

What other design would you offer?

-- 
-- Stephe



  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-27 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-26 17:16 Should a GUI be separated from the application? Lucretia
2006-09-27 13:09 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2006-09-27 18:26   ` tmoran
2006-09-28  6:09   ` Simon Wright
2006-09-28 16:52     ` Pascal Obry
2006-09-28 18:06       ` tmoran
2006-09-28 18:46         ` Pascal Obry
2006-09-29  4:56       ` Simon Wright
2006-09-29 17:54         ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox