From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.02
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:06:34 GMT
Date: 2002-01-03T13:06:34+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uHYY7.2038$cD4.3492@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrna38gp3.6mo.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
In article <slrna38gp3.6mo.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>, Preben
Randhol says...
>As far as I can see there are only gcc-c++, gcc-g77 (FORTRAN 77),
>gvv-java and gcc-objc pacakges. If gnat was included I would expect it
>was called gcc-gnat or gcc-ada or something like that.
Perhaps I'm a bit biased (nooooo), but if it includes Fortran, Java, and
ObjectiveC then it ought to include Ada too. Ada's just as much a part of the
3.1 baseline as those languages.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-03 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-02 19:04 GNAT and GCC 3.02 Mr. Caffiene
2002-01-02 19:41 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-02 21:46 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-03 9:49 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-01-03 11:40 ` Preben Randhol
2002-01-03 13:06 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2002-01-03 14:44 ` Preben Randhol
2002-01-03 15:27 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-03 15:38 ` Preben Randhol
2002-01-03 21:49 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-03 21:47 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-04 14:48 ` off-topic (wandering away from GNAT and GCC 3.02) Wes Groleau
2002-01-05 12:00 ` Florian Weimer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-03 23:19 GNAT and GCC 3.02 Anh Vo
2002-01-05 4:22 ` Steve Doiel
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox