From: Stephen Leake <Stephen.A.Leake@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Problem Eliminating constructors
Date: 21 Jan 2003 10:03:29 -0500
Date: 2003-01-21T15:15:52+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u8yxe5yv2.fsf@nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3e2c66a7$0$33929$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
> It would be nice if Ada0X would allow to make a primitive operation
> non-virtual.
>
> E.g. we can introduce "pragma Freeze(TYPE)".
How is this better than a nested package?
package Foo is
type Base is tagged private;
package Constructors is
function New_Base (Params : in ...) return Base;
end Constructors;
private
type Base is ...;
end Foo;
'New_Base' is not a primitive operation of Base, therefore it is not
dispatching.
I'm not clear why you want a subprogram that is primitive but not
dispatching.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-21 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-17 0:19 Problem Eliminating constructors Victor Porton
2003-01-17 15:21 ` John English
2003-01-17 21:10 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-18 15:19 ` Simon Wright
2003-01-20 11:39 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-20 21:07 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-21 9:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-01-21 19:01 ` Martin Krischik
2003-01-21 11:43 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-21 15:03 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2003-01-21 13:09 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-22 15:26 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-21 18:38 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-23 17:08 ` Stephen Leake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-17 6:54 Grein, Christoph
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox