From: Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Visibility problems with package instantiations.....
Date: 03 Dec 2003 13:09:25 -0500
Date: 2003-12-03T18:14:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u7k1d6aei.fsf@nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: nv6rsvcom1961uu0sno3ogg7g68hvvd7ck@4ax.com
Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> On 02 Dec 2003 11:20:08 -0500, Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>
> wrote:
>
> >Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> >
> >> On 01 Dec 2003 11:31:19 -0500, Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> On 30 Nov 2003 23:45:51 -0800, petter.fryklund@atero.se (Petter
> >> >> Fryklund) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >Our CM policy
> >> >> >also dictates a directory structure with every unit in it's own branch
> >> >> >leading to a large tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> It is a reasonable policy.
> >> >
> >> >Maybe for Java, which requires that directory structure anyway.
> >> >
> >> >But for Ada, which has a good way to name files that indicates the
> >> >package heirarchy, directories should be used for even higher level
> >> >organization, like projects.
> >>
> >> For a small or medium sized project one can indeed pack everything in
> >> one directory. With hundreds of files it becomes rather difficult.
> >
> >Why? I don't have a problem with 280 files on Windows 2000. What sorts
> >of problems do you run into?
>
> To find a file in that huge directory.
How does having multiple directories make that easier?
> Note also that a nested package of level 5 could have name like:
>
> fuzzy.graph.handle.learning.implementation.ads
>
> It becomes a pain to navigate across this directory. It is difficult
> for human eye to recognize a postfix of a long name.
Hmm. In emacs, I pull up the whole directory, then search in the
buffer.
But actually, to navigate Ada source, I don't tend to use file names;
I use Ada names, and let Emacs figure out where the files are.
> So one have to separate files in some way. One possible way is to
> mimic the package tree. It is a reasonable way, but not the only
> one.
File names that mimic the package tree are better than directories
that mimic the package tree, in my opinion. I haven't heard any solid
evidence here to contradict that.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-03 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-27 15:42 Visibility problems with package instantiations Petter Fryklund
2003-11-27 16:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-28 11:23 ` Petter Fryklund
2003-11-28 13:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-12-01 7:45 ` Petter Fryklund
2003-12-01 8:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-12-01 16:31 ` Stephen Leake
2003-12-02 9:00 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-12-02 16:20 ` Stephen Leake
2003-12-03 8:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-12-03 18:09 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2003-12-04 9:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-12-04 13:09 ` Stephen Leake
2003-12-04 14:03 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-12-04 19:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-12-05 0:30 ` Stephen Leake
2003-12-05 2:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-12-05 14:04 ` Stephen Leake
2003-12-05 12:14 ` Jeff C,
2003-12-05 13:13 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-05 20:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-12-05 21:10 ` Simon Wright
2003-12-02 17:07 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-12-03 8:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-12-02 4:25 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox