From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Subject: Re: Package Instances???
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:44:32 -0500
Date: 2002-02-20T18:44:32-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u78ct3pvhjnbf1@corp.supernews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3C73F5F6.7050704@mail.com
"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message
news:3C73F5F6.7050704@mail.com...
> Given that C++ classes can have arbitrary
> things defined in them (types, static functions, constants, etc.)
> considering them as an analogue of Ada packages is not wrong.
But it is wrong if your purpose is to implement a type, so that you can
declare objects, which you can pass to subprograms, etc. The fact that in
C++ you can declare things inside the class is irrelevent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-20 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-13 21:02 Package Instances??? Yates
2002-02-13 21:12 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-02-13 21:21 ` chris.danx
2002-02-13 21:46 ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-14 17:59 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-15 13:11 ` Marc A. Criley
2002-02-15 19:20 ` Simon Wright
2002-02-19 14:08 ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-20 1:37 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-02-20 16:56 ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-21 15:33 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-02-20 19:16 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-20 22:31 ` Pat Rogers
2002-02-20 23:44 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
2002-02-21 5:35 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-21 14:05 ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-22 16:49 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-22 17:22 ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-24 7:39 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-25 15:38 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-02-22 18:10 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-02-22 20:55 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-22 21:37 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-02-24 7:36 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-25 15:27 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-02-21 15:30 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-02-21 18:05 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-02-13 21:50 ` Eric Merritt
2002-02-14 15:08 ` Yates
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox