Re: Next public release of GNAT(?)

[Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>]

Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> writes:

> Gerhard H�ring <gerhard@bigfoot.de> writes:
> 
> > Frank wrote in <ILS_7.24134$KQ3.444593@news1.oke.nextra.no>:
> > > Hi!
> > >  
> > > Is there any forecast on when(if?) the public/free GNAT 3-14 for Linux
> > > becomes available?
> > 
> > Yes, it will be the day after I managed to build GNAT from the gcc
> > source tree.
> 
> AFAIK, what is present in the CVS tree is an evolution of GNAT 3.14
> (which is still based on gcc 2.8).

No, the whole point of the gcc tree is that it is at gcc 3.0, and the
Ada code builds on that. This will be the basis of the ACT 3.15
release. 

> BTW, personnally, I'd not make public an executable I manage to
> build from non released sources.

Hmm. What do you mean by "released"? By ACT, or by the gcc team? If
the latter, I'd agree.

-- 
-- Stephe