From: Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: virtual destructors
Date: 22 Apr 2003 13:18:56 -0400
Date: 2003-04-22T17:33:46+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u3ckacuwv.fsf@nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b83o2t$gd8$1@news.onet.pl
"kat-Zygfryd" <6667@wp.pl> writes:
> Never mind, I didn;t thinf of directly declaring
>
> procedure Free is new Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation(Base'Class,CBase);
> procedure Free is new Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation(Derived'Class,CDerived);
You also need to ensure that both access types use the same storage
pool. Something like:
for CDerived'Storage_Pool use CBase'Storage_Pool.
> Another question: are there any advantages in using Ada.Finalization
> for objects that will always be dynamically allocated/deallocated
> over simply declaring a Dispose procedure, with frees object's
> components before freeing itself?
Yes. The compiler ensures that Finalize is called. Users will forget
to call Dispose.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-22 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-22 14:18 virtual destructors kat-Zygfryd
2003-04-22 14:27 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-22 14:56 ` kat-Zygfryd
2003-04-22 15:45 ` kat-Zygfryd
2003-04-22 16:34 ` tmoran
2003-04-22 21:32 ` Robert A Duff
2003-04-22 17:18 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2003-04-22 16:34 ` Simon Wright
2003-04-22 19:57 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-22 20:19 ` Simon Wright
2003-04-22 21:23 ` Robert A Duff
2003-04-23 15:16 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-04-22 17:31 ` virtual destructors - doesn't seem to work kat-Zygfryd
2003-04-22 17:32 ` Simon Wright
2003-04-22 17:33 ` virtual destructors Matthew Heaney
2003-04-22 17:28 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-04-22 17:40 ` kat-Zygfryd
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox