From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Subject: Re: The Ada 2005 name
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 05:47:48 -0500
Date: 2007-02-24T05:47:48-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u1wkfx25n.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: erms8i$4ef$1@ikaria.belnet.be
dirk@cs.kuleuven.ac.be (Dirk Craeynest) writes:
> I notice that once in a while there appears to be some confusion
> about how to refer to the latest Ada language definition.
>
> FYI, the internationally accepted recommendation is to use the name
> "Ada 2005".
Thank you!
--
-- Stephe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-24 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 19:47 Bug in GNAT GPL 2006? (see below)
2007-02-21 20:19 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-02-21 20:57 ` (see below)
2007-02-22 2:14 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-02-22 6:09 ` (see below)
2007-02-22 6:53 ` Per Sandberg
2007-02-22 10:52 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2007-02-22 16:39 ` (see below)
2007-02-23 1:37 ` Robert A Duff
2007-02-23 3:51 ` (see below)
2007-02-24 19:15 ` Robert A Duff
2007-02-24 20:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-02-25 1:21 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-02-23 14:04 ` The Ada 2005 name (was: Re: Bug in GNAT GPL 2006?) Dirk Craeynest
2007-02-24 10:47 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox