From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Status of GNADE ODBC under Debian 64-bit
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:10:27 +0200
Date: 2012-09-07T14:10:27+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <turv8jle71bz.gl60h3tlq8nv.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7818bc08-d0ec-4c23-bd51-a6e6bb305cb8@googlegroups.com
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 04:25:32 -0700 (PDT), Graham Stark wrote:
> the scary bit is that (if I've read this right) sometimes function returns
> are 32 bit and sometimes 64 bit depending on the inputs.
This was always the case for most C bindings and MS ones especially.
> We're going to
> need a slightly thicker binding than at present to handle this, I'd think.
Yes. Simple components provide a safer layer on top GNADE ODBC. E.g.
controlled types for handles, typed SQLGetData, etc.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-03 19:17 Status of GNADE ODBC under Debian 64-bit Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-04 9:40 ` Graham Stark
2012-09-04 11:54 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-07 9:51 ` Stephen Leake
2012-09-07 10:57 ` Ludovic Brenta
2012-09-07 11:25 ` Graham Stark
2012-09-07 12:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2012-09-08 19:17 ` Stephen Leake
2012-09-10 18:10 ` Graham Stark
2012-09-07 11:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-07 16:06 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox