From: Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Subject: Re: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?
Date: 27 Sep 2001 17:32:19 +0200
Date: 2001-09-27T17:32:19+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tglmj03b0c.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wWGr7.2969$ev2.1759@www.newsranger.com
Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes:
> In article <8766aajjvh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer says...
> >
> >Are there any ideas how to ensure binary compatibility across GNAT
> >builds from different distributors of the same operating system?
>
> Pardon me for a naieve question: What exactly, save a source code
> modification, would cause such an incompatability?
Different sonames for the GNAT run-time library, or a diffent default
threading implementation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-27 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-22 15:52 Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? DuckE
2001-09-23 0:29 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-23 10:12 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-24 13:54 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-27 15:32 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2001-09-28 13:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-29 20:38 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-23 15:20 ` Dave Parsons
2001-09-24 13:59 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-30 16:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-25 4:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-25 6:12 ` Source of 3.13p binary for OS/2. (Was: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?) Dave Parsons
2001-09-30 15:58 ` Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? Robert Dewar
2002-03-02 10:24 ` 3.14p Binary for OS/2. Was: " Dave Parsons
2002-03-02 17:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 7:11 ` Dave Parsons
2002-03-03 13:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 10:41 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-05 6:10 ` Dave Parsons
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox