From: No Spam <nospam@nospam.com>
Subject: Re: Contrained ada type in java
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:54:41 -0500
Date: 2003-12-17T09:54:41-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tdr0uvs163vi2cnhnae8b9nmk2jq2djsk9@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: sbrvtvgdcdjps866mbuonffsl816ucgipd@4ax.com
Compare
>| public boolean equals(Object obj) {
>| // Assume proper type was given <<<<------
>| return (__level == ((Volume)obj).__level);
>| }
>|
>| public int compareTo(Object obj) {
>| // Assume proper type was given <<<<------
>| int other = ((Volume)obj).__level;
With
>| It is quite a lot of work just to get the functionality of
>| enumerated types. Simply using integer constants will be sufficient
>| for most programs, but when value restriction and type safety become <<<<-------
>| issues, you will have to resort to some variation of the more
>| complicated solution.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-17 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 22:17 Contrained ada type in java Ed Trubia
2003-12-11 3:56 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2003-12-11 17:56 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-12-17 5:56 ` Craig Carey
2003-12-17 14:54 ` No Spam [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox