From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Access types and classwide programming
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:16:57 GMT
Date: 2001-09-17T14:16:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tBnp7.2835$p77.4937@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: qpfp7.15438$L%5.12873076@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com
In article <qpfp7.15438$L%5.12873076@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com>, tmoran@acm.org
says...
>
>> For x'address use blah;
>> ...
>> (PC with Win9x)
> You're barking up the wrong tree if you start worrying about address
>clauses for an OS on x86 machines - they use IO instructions, not memory
>mapped IO.
Now I'm just getting into this, so correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't I/O to the
PCI bus done almost entirely with memory mapped addresses and interrupts?
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-17 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-15 19:36 Access types and classwide programming chris.danx
2001-09-15 20:28 ` chris.danx
2001-09-15 23:42 ` [Different Topic] Endianess? chris.danx
2001-09-16 6:22 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-17 7:37 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 7:53 ` Assigning the value of a deferred constant? Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 14:04 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-17 14:36 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 17:36 ` tmoran
2001-09-18 8:16 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-18 18:40 ` Richard Riehle
2001-09-19 2:07 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-09-19 7:39 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-16 6:19 ` Access types and classwide programming Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-16 13:37 ` chris.danx
2001-09-16 16:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-16 18:24 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-09-17 6:15 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-17 4:57 ` tmoran
2001-09-17 14:16 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-09-16 9:32 ` tmoran
2001-09-17 9:41 ` John McCabe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox