From: Hyman Rosen <hymie@prolifics.com>
Subject: Re: Ada->C++ conversion stats?
Date: 2000/03/21
Date: 2000-03-21T14:30:53+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <t7d7oofl8v.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38D722C1.8B6C58F7@gte.net
"Robert L. Klungle" <bklungle@gte.net> writes:
> The C++ version execution time is 3 times slower than the original Ada.
> Primarily due to the implementation of an Array (Matrix) class as a
> Class of Vectors-of-Vectors.
> This was done to keep the matrix type of referencing ([][]). There is no
> C++ operator to overload of this kind.
You should certainly not implement (non-sparse) matrices as vectors
of vectors! I would advise you to get a copy of Barton & Nackman's
"Scientific and Engineering C++". There are all sorts of efficient
algorithms in there for implementing matrices while preserving the
[][] C++ array referencing syntax.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-21 0:00 Ada->C++ conversion stats? tmoran
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Robert L. Klungle
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Gerald Kasner
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox