From: "chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Data Structure Choice for DOM
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 21:47:14 +0000
Date: 2003-03-08T21:47:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sxtaa.17491$EN3.142147@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba162549.0303071448.35da9100@posting.google.com>
Kevin Cline wrote:
>
> Do whichever is easiest.
If only! ;)
I had a nice set of data structures I'd written around 6 months ago
backed up and the CD is now jiggered! Going to have to rewrite them,
which is a shame since they used Safe Pointers (ala Mr Grein) to make
iterators on structures safe :(
> The maps typically contain only a few entries,
> so the slight differences in performance will probably be undetectable.
Hadn't thought of that, you're right! Who's going to notice 2 accesses
with an AVL in comparison to 5 with a list?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-08 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-07 18:49 Data Structure Choice for DOM chris.danx
2003-03-07 21:29 ` Simon Wright
2003-03-07 21:46 ` chris.danx
2003-03-10 19:10 ` Stephen Leake
2003-03-07 22:48 ` Kevin Cline
2003-03-08 21:47 ` chris.danx [this message]
2003-03-11 2:04 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox