From: John McCabe <john@nospam.assen.demon.co.uk.nospam>
Subject: Re: Lack of formal syntax undermines Ada
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:34:09 +0100
Date: 2008-04-13T20:34:09+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <son404d3f74k4g2pu5h4rlppm69cmj175a@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: C427D3A9.E4698%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk
"(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> What, me and you? Weird! It's been a long time since I was on here
>> regularly though, so easily forgotten :-)
>
><http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/3885b7fd6
>6a1db28/e32a7e7bad2ebf54?lnk=st&q=#e32a7e7bad2ebf54>
Oh dear - only 5 and a bit years :-)
>>> Did you use cards on the ICL 2976 for your labs?
>>
>> No. We used a VAX. ....
>Was that in a room with 16 terminals in Lilybank Gardens,
>using the "HOCUS" system on a VAX 11/750?
HOCUS sounds familiar, and it could have been in Lilybank Gardens, but
I can't remember off-hand. I think it was quite a small room in an
older building. It definitely wasn't anything like the Boyd Orr or
Rankine Buildings, and I don't remember it having been the main
building so....
>> As a matter of interest, have I
>> already asked you if you could remember who we might have been taught
>> by? It was an old, miserable guy who wore tweed a lot as far as I can
>> remember.
>I can think of one or two candidates (neither being me!).
>Was he tall and gaunt; or shorter, moustached, and a heavy smoker?
Probably shorter, but I don't remember him having a moustache. Whoever
he was, he didn't like people throwing paper aeroplanes around :-)
There's a vague chance his name was something like Watt.
>Our most recent effort:
><http://www.amazon.co.uk/Programming-Language-Design-Concepts-David/dp/04708
>53204/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208095483&sr=1-1>
>was re-set by the publisher, using our .doc files, in their "house style",
>and they managed to make it less legible, in my opinion, than our originals.
>Ho hum.
>
>At least it contains a fair account of Ada, showing its advantages,
>especially for concurrency, over the other languages covered.
>This despite opposition from the publisher and anonymous reviewers.
>It seems that complete ignorance of Ada is no bar to pontificating about it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-13 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-11 9:41 Lack of formal syntax undermines Ada usenet
2008-04-11 11:20 ` Peter C. Chapin
2008-04-15 12:57 ` usenet
2008-04-16 2:26 ` Peter C. Chapin
2008-04-16 3:14 ` Eric Hughes
2008-04-17 6:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-04-11 17:27 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-04-11 18:13 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-11 21:25 ` John McCabe
2008-04-11 21:45 ` Robert A Duff
2008-04-11 22:37 ` John McCabe
2008-04-11 23:08 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-12 7:16 ` Dirk Craeynest
2008-04-14 7:23 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-04-12 12:57 ` Robert A Duff
2008-04-12 15:06 ` (see below)
2008-04-12 16:25 ` John McCabe
2008-04-12 17:55 ` (see below)
2008-04-12 22:19 ` John McCabe
2008-04-13 1:13 ` (see below)
2008-04-13 11:51 ` John McCabe
2008-04-13 14:13 ` (see below)
2008-04-13 19:34 ` John McCabe [this message]
2008-04-13 20:51 ` (see below)
2008-04-13 21:06 ` John McCabe
2008-04-12 17:16 ` Gary Scott
2008-04-12 18:43 ` Peter C. Chapin
2008-04-12 19:16 ` Gary Scott
2008-04-12 20:04 ` Robert A Duff
2008-04-12 23:32 ` Gary Scott
2008-04-13 1:16 ` Robert A Duff
2008-04-12 20:02 ` Robert A Duff
2008-04-12 20:52 ` Pascal Obry
2008-04-13 22:01 ` Florian Weimer
2008-04-13 9:46 ` anon
2008-04-15 13:22 ` usenet
2008-04-15 16:08 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-13 22:04 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox