From: Nicholas Paul Collin Gloucester <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Subject: Re: AWS Sites
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2009-03-04T20:46:11+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrngqtq62.mv3.Colin_Paul_Gloster@Bluewhite64.example.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dbd65cb4-c87a-43c5-9b8e-38abddef4079@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com
On 2009-03-04, Graham Stark <graham.stark@virtual-worlds.biz> wrote:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"[..] |
| |
|Apache is likely to be much faster at serving static pages but AWS |
|will likely outrun a typical dynamic setup using Apache/PHP or Java or|
|whatever. It's actually straightforward to use both together, with |
|Apache serving the images, etc. and AWS doing the hard bits. |
| |
|[..]" |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
How would AWS's dynamic performance compare against a Lisp webserver?
(Not that I would like Lisp's encouraging of dynamism where dynamism
is inappropriate.)
Yours sincerely,
Colin Paul Gloster
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-04 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-04 17:41 AWS Sites Graham Stark
2009-03-04 20:46 ` Nicholas Paul Collin Gloucester [this message]
2009-03-04 23:44 ` Srini -
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-04 3:25 RasikaSrinivasan
2009-03-04 7:44 ` Vadim Godunko
2009-03-04 10:50 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2009-03-04 10:56 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-03-04 15:00 ` Tero Koskinen
2009-03-04 18:34 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox