From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
Subject: Re: High CPU in tasking
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:02:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-07-01T07:02:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnce7dnq.og.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2qmdnaxjEPyH0n7dRVn-sw@megapath.net
* Randy Brukardt wrote:
> It should be noted that the limitation on the range of protected entry
> families is a weird limitation of some versions of GNAT, and not one
> intended/expected by the Ada language. GNAT is the only Ada compiler of
> the ones I usually test that has this sort of limitation. Janus/Ada, for
> instance, treats protected entry families as an additional parameter to
> the entry (which is very different than the way task entry families are
> implemented). Perhaps you'd have better performance if you didn't need
> this workaround?
The registration overhead is small, so I do expect only the significant
drop in management overhead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-01 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-24 15:43 High CPU in tasking Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-24 17:00 ` Nick Roberts
2004-06-24 20:25 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-24 21:56 ` Nick Roberts
2004-06-25 7:34 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-25 17:03 ` Nick Roberts
2004-06-28 8:32 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-29 17:26 ` Nick Roberts
2004-06-30 12:26 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2004-06-30 23:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-07-01 7:02 ` Lutz Donnerhacke [this message]
2004-06-25 21:15 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-06-26 8:01 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-06-28 8:17 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox