From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: Overloading procedures with Float and Long_Float types
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:07:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-03-08T14:07:40+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnc4ovhc.2eu.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 404c7e53.0@entanet
On 2004-03-08, Luke Guest <lguest@bubball.com> wrote:
>
> Basically, it just seems to be wasting a good opportunity for overloading
> here.
I really don't understand why one have a Float and a Long_Float in the
first place? Why not simply have a Long_Float?
--
Rox-Filer; *the* file manager => http://rox.sf.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-08 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-08 0:17 Overloading procedures with Float and Long_Float types Luke A. Guest
2004-03-08 3:49 ` James Rogers
2004-03-08 8:16 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-03-08 8:20 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-08 9:06 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-03-08 10:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-03-08 14:05 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-08 14:07 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2004-03-08 15:10 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-08 16:20 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-08 16:28 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-08 17:58 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-09 8:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-03-08 16:50 ` Hyman Rosen
2004-03-08 16:55 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-08 17:32 ` Hyman Rosen
2004-03-08 14:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-03-08 15:18 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-08 19:52 ` Gautier Write-only
2004-03-08 20:34 ` Luke A. Guest
2004-03-09 8:40 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-03-08 12:46 ` David C. Hoos
2004-03-08 14:03 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-08 14:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-03-08 15:19 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-08 16:04 ` David C. Hoos
2004-03-08 16:17 ` Luke Guest
2004-03-09 9:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-03-08 19:58 ` Gautier Write-only
[not found] ` <1faf01c40527$0a364a10$b101a8c0@sy.com>
2004-03-08 16:21 ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox