From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-01-22T13:06:32+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnc0vimo.a1.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: BstKGX8849Vw@eisner.encompasserve.org
On 2004-01-22, Larry Kilgallen <Kilgallen@SpamCop.net> wrote:
>
> For improvement of the Internet, it is better to reject such connections
> at the SMTP level, or best of all engage in teergrubing/tarpitting. Such
> are typically done based on DNSbls of the email administrator's choice.
Well, since it isn't done I would suspect this approach isn't working.
Besides by the time one find out which DNS that sendt the SPAM they
probably moved to another. Or they broke into a persons machine and used
it. Another solution would be SPAM-viruses etc...
--
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
language."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-22 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.9.1074679047.281.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
2004-01-21 18:05 ` OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled tmoran
2004-01-21 19:28 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-01-22 7:56 ` Preben Randhol
2004-01-22 10:41 ` Larry Kilgallen
2004-01-22 13:06 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2004-01-22 15:47 ` Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox