From: Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: "continue/next" for "loop"
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-11-03T14:23:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnbqcp67.eeq.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.263.1067868012.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
On 2003-11-03, christoph.grein@eurocopter.com <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com> wrote:
> Really, Lutz, I do not see why you by any force would like a solution
> without goto. It's the most appropriate solution in this case!
>
> The goto solution is better understandable than the boolean condition
> one. And it's simpler. Has anyone noticed that More_Statments are
> missing in the non-goto solution?
>
> Why is the goto braindead? Your coding standards forbit it? I hate
> those silly standards which forbid the most natural solution.
Links on this: (Ada, goto and state machine)
<URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&frame=right&th=2e40522bae321cd3&seekm=yeung-ya02408000R0907970151100001%40news.apple.com#link1>
<URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&frame=right&rnum=1&thl=0,1962504160,1962489216,1962271017,1962126670,1961964531,1961870021,1961870001,1961823517,1961823513,1961823498,1961752985&seekm=3m0nv5%2467l%40theopolis.orl.mmc.com#link1>
<URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&frame=right&rnum=1&thl=0,1859794614,1859987362,1859947797,1859825550,1859773407,1858986694,1859689585,1858790444,1858650901,1857956692,1857898236&seekm=dewar.866134855%40merv#link1>
<URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&frame=right&th=6ab044fa0a1401a2&seekm=dewar.866287533%40merv#link1>
Preben
--
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
language."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-03 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-03 13:45 "continue/next" for "loop" christoph.grein
2003-11-03 14:23 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2003-11-03 15:01 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-03 15:19 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-03 18:33 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-11-03 15:48 ` Preben Randhol
2003-11-03 18:50 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-11-03 15:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-03 15:44 amado.alves
2003-11-03 22:12 ` Dmytry Lavrov
2003-11-03 22:27 ` Gautier Write-only
2003-11-03 13:54 amado.alves
2003-11-03 12:55 amado.alves
2003-11-03 13:06 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-03 13:07 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-03 13:25 ` Peter Hermann
2003-11-03 16:49 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-11-03 18:21 ` (see below)
2003-11-03 18:52 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-11-03 20:11 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-04 1:23 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-11-03 13:33 ` James Rogers
2003-11-03 13:46 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-03 13:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-11-03 13:54 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2003-11-03 14:56 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-03 15:08 ` Stefan Lucks
2003-11-03 15:40 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-05 10:36 ` Charles Lindsey
2003-11-05 18:05 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-06 9:48 ` Martin Dowie
2003-11-07 14:54 ` Charles Lindsey
2003-11-07 16:24 ` Martin Dowie
2003-11-07 17:34 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-11-05 14:45 ` Jim Rogers
2003-11-03 10:48 Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-03 10:51 ` Preben Randhol
2003-11-03 10:55 ` Preben Randhol
2003-11-03 11:01 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-11-04 3:11 ` Steve
2003-11-05 15:54 ` sk
2003-11-06 15:40 ` Stephen Leake
2003-11-06 18:27 ` sk
2003-11-06 15:39 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox