From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
Subject: Re: Interfaces and Generics?
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:13:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-09-17T11:13:49+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnbmggfb.nu.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F67A207.7060007@attbi.com
* Robert I. Eachus wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, you would like to be able to say:
>
> generic
> type Foo is new A with B, C;
> package Bar is...
>
> If so, it is a very good question. I don't think it is currently part
> of the proposal. I am also not sure how useful it would be, but it
> would certainly be a good idea for orthogonality reasons.
What about 'type Foo is new A, B, C with private;'?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-17 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 23:41 Interfaces and Generics? chris
2003-09-16 23:52 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-09-17 11:13 ` Lutz Donnerhacke [this message]
2003-09-17 21:06 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox