From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: Null record
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:10:00 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-08-16T09:10:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnbjrt60.i2.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3f3db971_1@news.tm.net.my
Adrian Hoe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a silly question.
>
> A null record can be implemented as follow:
>
> Method 1:
>
> type Blank is new Some_Record with null record;
>
> Method 2:
>
> type Blank is new Some_Record with
> record
> null;
> end record;
>
>
> Which is the most popular form and why? I assume personal preference
> influences the choice.
I think Method 1 was made particularily for this usage. I would say
Method 1 as Method 2 looks like incomplete code if you consider:
procedure Do_Something_Callback (Object : T) is
begin
null;
end Do_Something_Callback;
which could be automatically generated from a spec file.
--
�I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet.
So who am I to judge.�
- The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy (radioplay)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-16 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-16 4:54 Null record Adrian Hoe
2003-08-16 9:10 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2003-08-16 12:58 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox