Re: Optimizing Boundary Checks

[Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>]

Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> Preben Randhol wrote:
> 
>>Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
>>> 
>>> I guess, you are refering to
>>><slrnbdpdan.87p.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>?
>>
>>No to:
>>
>><mailman.1.1054650999.19078.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
> 
> Yes, of course, I meant that. The posting I mentioned was your answer
> to this. The classical off-by-one error, I'd say. ;-)

But still I'm a bit confused. The original poster was he right or did he
have to use type ... in stead of subtype to get the boundary checks
optimized out?

Sorry to reitterate my qeustions, just want to understand this 100% :-)

-- 
Preben Randhol                    http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/