Re: ANN: BUSH 0.9.2 released

["Eric G. Miller" <felix@calico.local>]

In article <3E4D963C.673E0E32@sympatico.ca>, Ken O. Burtch wrote:
> 
> 
> BUSH 0.9.2 has been released.  It is available at the PegaSoft website:
[snip]
> New to this version:
> 
[snip]
>      * pragma depreciated( "newscript" ); -- mark a script as obsolete 

ITYM, "pragma deprecated ("newscript");"

I realize that deprecate/depreciate are nearly synonymous, but it seems
that folks usually use "deprecate" to mark an interface obsolete and a
candidate for removal from future versions.

For example (http://www.rfc-editor.org/overview.html):
"""
 RFC Categories

   Each RFC has a "category" or "status" designation. The possible
   categories (see RFC 2026 "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
   3") are:

...

   * HISTORIC

      These are former standards that have been actively deprecated.
"""

When I see "depreciate", I think of capital investments and tax
deductions... ;-)

-- 
echo ">gra.fcw@2ztr< eryyvZ .T pveR" | rot13 | reverse