From: "Eric G. Miller" <felix@calico.local>
Subject: Re: TASH and gcc-3.2 -- no selector Obj for type Tash_List ...
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:19:23 GMT
Date: 2003-01-20T00:19:23+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnb2mgb5.eg7.felix@calico.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uhec586th.fsf@wanadoo.fr
In article <uhec586th.fsf@wanadoo.fr>, Pascal Obry wrote:
>> Well, a Tash_List is a new Tash_Object which has a private member Obj
>> which should be visible in child packages of Tash...
>>
>> Did I miss anything?
>
> Obj is not visible from child package TASH.Arrays. So Set_Element can't
> access it.
Errm, Is this because Tash.Arrays is a child of Tash, not Tash.Lists?
I have changed tash-arrays.adb to "with" both Tash and Tash.Lists
explicitly w/ no change.
Hmm, is this a correct "cast":
Listv(2) := List_Object'Class(Value).Obj;
It seems to move the compilation on... I didn't figure you could cast to
an abstract class object... But, I still get a bunch of elaboration
errors and "may raise Program_Error" warnings. Doesn't exactly make me
confident that the package would work even if it did compile...
I thought others were using this Tcl/Tk binding. For instace, that A#
announcement I've seen here...
--
echo ">gra.fcw@2ztr< eryyvZ .T pveR" | rot13 | reverse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-20 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-19 11:48 TASH and gcc-3.2 -- no selector Obj for type Tash_List Eric G. Miller
2003-01-19 16:04 ` Pascal Obry
2003-01-20 0:19 ` Eric G. Miller [this message]
2003-01-20 6:03 ` Eric G. Miller
2003-01-21 5:45 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox