From: Preben Randhol <randhol+news@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: GNAT Programming System availability ?
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2002-11-20T10:21:43+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnatmoh0.ed.randhol+news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ddb4171$0$298$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
Victor Porton wrote:
>
> Somebody in this newsgroup has said that GNAT developers do not
> read c.l.a . You, Arno, is an example of opposite.
>
> So whether we should duplicate our bug reports in email or just
> in newsgroup is enough?
No, you should file bug reports to ACT. One cannot expect them to follow
the thread here and pick out real compiler bugs from all the bugs that
turn out to be only a bug in the source code and not in the compiler.
--
Preben Randhol ------------------------ http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ --
�1984 is coming to a computer near you.�
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-20 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-19 12:01 GNAT Programming System availability ? Simon Clubley
2002-11-19 13:12 ` Arnaud Charlet
2002-11-20 3:21 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-20 10:21 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2002-11-20 10:23 ` chris.danx
2002-11-20 14:15 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-23 17:39 ` Richard Riehle
2002-11-23 18:02 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-25 9:40 ` GNAT bug reports (Was: GNAT Programming System availability ?) Arnaud Charlet
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox