Re: GCC 3.1 / Ada / Cygwin / Win2k ?

[Preben Randhol <randhol+news@pvv.org>]

Wes Groleau wrote:
> No.  I booted the Linux Install CD and tried to use that to repartition
> the _second_ partition (which Win2K calls D: but is unable to read).
> This partition had Linux on it at the time, but it was at the beginning
> of a twelve Gig partition, leaving eleven Gig empty.   I tried to split it
> into 9 NTFS and 3 Linux.  This appeared to succeed, and installing Linux
> into the three appeared to succeed.  Obviously, installing Linux the
> first time in D: (which included splitting the 15 Gig D: into twelve and
> three and reformatting to UFS and swap) did succeed the first time.

UFS ? Why did you choose that? I would use ext2 or ext3?

> I've forgotten how we got to this from a subject line of
>     Re: GCC 3.1 / Ada / Cygwin / Win2k ?
> 
>:-)

dunno :-) 

-- 
Preben Randhol  --------------------  http://www.pvv.org/~randhol
�.., chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being
sought. It always defeats order, because it is better organized.�
                            -- Interesting Times, Terry Pratchett